Light Tank: Mission Engineered for Performance
Sub Title : We need to follow a mission engineered approach for the Light Tank
Issues Details : Vol 15 Issue 2 May – Jun 2021
Author : Lt Gen (Dr) N B Singh, PVSM, AVSM, VSM, ADC
Page No. : 50
Category : Military Technology
: July 1, 2021
Militaries around the world are heavily investing in unmanned aerial vehicle technologies and drone warfare. These technologies are leading the evolution in airpower. Accordingly, China is concentrating on high end military UAVs, many of which have already been exported around the globe. One system that is the flagship is the Wing Loong series of UAVs and Combat UAVS (UCAV)
The Army recently floated a RFI seeking prospective vendors to procure around 350 light tanks under the Make in India initiative. The RFI is indicative that the planners are seeking a platform that can execute operations in varying terrain conditions across diverse threat and equipment profile of the adversary. They are also looking at overseas deployment capability. As in the past , the Army appears to be looking at a one size fits all approach, a do all and end all tool developed for all contingencies. Its pursuit for a Wunderwaffe or a super weapon may end up with heavy time and cost overruns and sub par performance .
For years the Army has overlooked the fact that the current lot of tanks and ICVs that form the core of its mechanized fleet and have been deployed at the LAC were designed for missions in Western Europe; primarily the race to the Rhine . On numerous occasions foreign know how that has come after multi billion dollar payouts has not given sustained performance or worked “as it is“ in India. Sustained performance implies an ability to operate failure free for a specified period of time, to move uphill for certain kilometres without a breakdown, to fire certain number of rounds failure free This lesson has been learnt repeatedly but never corrected, because of absence of institutional memory and the tendency of commanders to play these down during their short tenures.
The Army needs to first work on a platform for conventional, short to mid duration infantry predominant combat missions in ultra high altitudes, that is designed for reliability, developed as an invincible lethal ground vehicle ever deployed in high altitudes and then evolve it for employment in plains, deserts, etc. This is because the current systems deployed at LAC may not deliver desired combat capability when required. The light tank needs to be engineered around some complex missions that a combat team may be required to perform to support infantry or to destroy enemy forces comprising armoured and motorized troops. Designing a system for high altitude warfare needs a different set of criteria as compared to other terrains. The mobility requirements are different, missiles controls could go awry, and modern electronic systems could behave erratically. The adversary over the years has acquired substantial warfighting capabilities spanning multiple domains such as time, mission, space, cyber, electro magnetic spectrum(EMS), NBC with employment of disruptive technologies and techniques. A weapon system has to be specially designed against such a threat and fortified against both kinetic and non kinetic attacks to survive and deliver equipment capability.
Realizing the importance of equipment capability, the PLA has fielded systems specifically engineered for combat at the LAC. Two of the most talked about systems are Type 15 light tank and ZBL 09 wheeled light tank . Type 15 with its derated power to weight ratio of over 20 in areas like Depsang and Demchok will prove to be more agile than the medium tanks deployed .
It is therefore important that the Army commences development by firming up the mission capability i.e. performance it expects from the light tank in mountains and high altitudes areas (HAA). A look at light tanks available world over indicates that these were developed for specific missions as relevant to these countries. Most are grossly under powered for high altitudes, lack survivability or are armed with a primary armament fast approaching obsolescence. Even with band aid measures to meet the RFP requirements, none may be a match to PLA`s platforms and other technological countermeasures. Let us analyse the key criteria around which the light tank needs to be developed for deployment in mountains, which may not be similar to those essential for deserts, plains or built up areas.
The fundamental issue for any platform remains performance, which is directly linked to survivability, which in turn is the outcome of protection, mobility and firepower. It may be better to replace mobility with agility, which is the net sum of physical mobility and battle field awareness of the crew. Agility is the capacity to respond quickly, effectively, and efficiently to a wide variety of unpredictable demands. The Army may be looking for an universal solution but different types of combat operations put different demands on combat vehicles, particularly from the survivability angle; the type of weapons that may be fired at the vehicle and the direction from which these strike the vehicle. Let us evaluate these characteristics as applicable to HAA.
- Protection. Mountainous terrains offer a distinct advantage to troops occupying heights as small detachments suitably armed can bring in precision fire from all directions employing kinetic energy, shaped charge and explosively formed penetrators (EFP). Warheads fired by precision artillery are another challenging threat . They can attack a vehicle from the top, where the vehicle has less armour and is usually more vulnerable. PLA has developed substantial capabilities in this field. Unguided artillery and mortars pose less of a threat because it is difficult to get hits on armoured vehicles. East European tanks are most vulnerable to attacks from side and top. Therefore , there may be a need to sacrifice mobility for greater protection and counter the emerging threat from EFP and shaped charges. Use of Kanchan armour encased in a welded steel structure at selected locations, light weight modular and slat armour could be a way to address evolving threats. Compartmentalization and redundant design are two approaches that improve survivability in the event of penetration. A revisit is called for on the requirement of reactive armour as added weight impacts mobility besides the exploding tiles could cause casualties among infantrymen operating alongside and inhibit tank crews from keeping the cupolas open. Protection against nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) threats poses special challenges.
- Agility. Moving forward to agility, visuals of medium tanks spewing black clouds of exhaust and over strained engines on social media indicates the severe power loss that takes place in HAA. With each day of deployment these machines are depleting their equipment capability. It is important that the current lot of tanks and ICVs are provided with suitable altitude compensation systems or upgrades to plug these serious capability gaps in operational tempos. The moves in mountains are constrained by terrain and are likely to be mostly at lower speeds over short distances, uphill or downhill. Mobility is primarily regulated by power to weight ratio. The mobility module thus needs to provide a power to weight ratio of over 30 at mean sea level, to cater for power loss at high altitudes and guarantee failure free operation of minimum 200 hours. The transmission needs to be all mechanical sans torque convertor to conserve fuel, preferably a continuously variable type. A twin engine configuration could be considered to enhance survivability. All vehicles need to have a hardened tactical internet to allow continuous communications among vehicles and tracking of potential targets and friendly forces for battlefield awareness. The local industry has the capability to provide military grade powerpacks and running gear, as also early awareness systems.
- Firepower. Coming to fire power , it is important to equip the tank with an ultra reliable ordnance, that can fire modern ammunition failure free. The weapons module should guarantee accident free firing of at least 160 to 200 rounds to maximize crew survivability, confidence and morale. The current 125 mm system has suffered several accidents, many fatal and may not be the right choice. The indigenous 105 mm and 120 mm rifled guns are safer options , these need to be optimized from the performance and weight angle and a low recoil smoothbore 120/130 mm version could be developed later. It is well within the capability of DRDO. Another reason to discard the 125mm ordnance is that similar system is available with our adversaries and suitable countermeasures must have been developed by PLA . There is also a need to develop indigenous munitions, designed for safety using Insensitive Munitions technology and a design for life philosophy. This is also critical from national sovereignty and assured supply angle ; the large scale import of ammunition during the current stand off has reinforced the need for self reliance .
System Design and Development.
It is time the country establishes a full spectrum capability to design and develop complex platforms for land systems. Sub systems and components may be procured from abroad initially but the system design capability has to be indigenous. This becomes important strategically , because soldiers can then be assured that the weapons on which they depend for warfighting will always be available in a highly reliable state and that no specifications will get compromised ,which could enable the adversary to develop counter measures. Currently such a knowledge base is only available with DRDO, which needs to be consolidated through partnerships with the private sector with the aim of creating a world class design capability in combat vehicles. The light tank programme can be a forerunner to achieving this capability under Atmanirbhar Bharat. Any attempts to buy and manufacture using the technology transfer route will effectively kill the indigenous knowledge cache built by DRDO over the years. A great attention will have to be paid by DRDO to system maturity and system readiness requirements unlike the Arjun development.
Qualitative Requirements (QR)
The QR of the light tank need to be firmed up based on a mission engineering exercise, lessons learnt during the current deployment and 1962 war. Moreover, with the threat across the LAC becoming multi domain, a creative performance centric approach is called for. Future wars in mountains will be fought from a distance, rarely hand-to-hand. Electronic systems, precision weapons, and communication capabilities will change the employment of forces. It needs to be taken for granted that the light tank will have to operate in a contested EMS and hence should be able to shoot and communicate in such a scenario. Measures like electronic spoofing and electro optic protection need to be considered. However, from the RFI, it is evident that as in the past, the focus is on attributes and not capabilities.
QR need to be based on mission capability needed on ground. It would be useful to adopt a layered and incremental development strategy. Level 1 should include QR that have to be provided in the first prototype and are vital for combat effectiveness against the PLA. Level 2 could include QR that need to be included in the first prototype though not in a fully mature state. Level 3 could include QR that are more relevant for operations in deserts, plains, islands, etc. Realistic and achievable operational requirements along with a collaborative approach between public and private sector could lead to a shorter development timeline that allows for the fielding of an effective system in about three to four years as against the normal period of over seven years.
It is a common saying that tracks are for deserts and wheels are for mountains. Mountains offer very limited trafficability for tracks, which can disrupt lines of communications if immobilized on passes and narrow stretches. A wheeled combat vehicle (WCV) can be easily pulled aside to clear the route . WCVs are superior for missions that require tactical moves involving more than 70% road moves and limited off road moves as in mountains. Tracks get dislodged easily , are difficult to repair and have shorter life. If a track gets blown off by enemy action the tracked vehicle is immobilized, however WCVs can still travel 40-50 kms. WCVs are capable of self deploying over long distances and the crew arrives in the operational areas relatively less fatigued.
Therefore, it would be prudent to develop the light tank in two versions; a wheeled tank destroyer cum bunker burster and a tracked platform, to increase the bandwidth of employment i.e. in Sikkim and north east. If tank and fortification destroying weapons can be mounted on a low cost platform and fielded in large numbers, the quantitative advantage of the adversary in hardware can be offset. The wheeled tank can be employed to destroy enemy armour and combat vehicles from vantage points and also provide direct fire support to infantry. It needs to be light weight and modular so that it can be transported and assembled anywhere on those icy slopes. One needs to revisit the infantry assault on Zojila pass in Nov 1948 and the innovative work of EME that enabled use of Stuart tanks in direct firing role. Being simpler in design, the tank destroyer can be engineered for high reliability and enduring duty cycles .
It is time that the Army focusses on developing home grown systems to meet the peculiar operational tempos of mountain warfare . For long it has relied on acquiring and fielding imported systems not engineered for combat in such difficult terrains, often extracting sub optimal performance, resulting in large casualties. Non availability of AMX light tanks resulted in massive loss of lives at Rezangla in 1962 and absence of direct fire support constrained the infantry to suffer heavy losses during Kargil. It is time the gallant Indian soldier and junior combat leaders are provided with bespoke weapons that do not encounter barrel burst, malfunctions or gasp for oxygen while operating in ultra high altitudes. Instead, these should provide an aura of invincibility to launch composite responses on the adversary. The Merkava and Iron Dome are outstanding examples of combat systems engineered for performance.